Judge Smacks Down Elevance’s Rating Drama Like Reality TV
In a plot twist that even daytime soap operas envy, a federal judge decisively rejected Elevance's dramatic claim that the government unfairly lowered its ratings. Elevance tried to play the victim card, but the court basically said, 'Nice try, but maybe change your WiFi provider before blaming the government.' No official names beyond 'Elevance' and the judge were dropped, but the ruling was clear: the government didn’t pull a prank on Elevance’s ratings. The judge’s decision is now the hottest legal clapback since that fire meme about unbothered cats.
Share the Story
Elevance tried to blame the government for bad ratings like an actor blaming the script, but the judge just handed out a reality check harsher than your ex’s texts.
When your Netflix shows get bad ratings, you blame the algorithm; when Elevance gets low marks, it blames the government. Consistency, or just business as usual?
Elevance’s ratings got a downgrade and instead of 'maybe improve,' they filed a complaint. Judges weren’t buying the cry-fest — plot twist, accountability isn’t optional.
Source: Statnews | Published: 8/19/2025 | Author: Bob Herman
More Articles in US News
Politico Announces Australia Launch for 2026, Because Why Not Start Late?
Trump Calls Supreme Court 'Unfortunate,' Then Hits Economy with ‘Better’ 10% Global Tariff
Trump Promises Retirement Plan That Matches Generosity of Federal Workers’ Excuses
30 Lawmakers Diplomatically Skip Trump Speech For The 'People’s State Of The Union' Party
Traveler Confirms Small Towns Are America’s Scenic Waiting Rooms
Buy 1794 D.C. Home: $1.3M For Seven Fireplaces and a 1960s Time Capsule Kitchen
