Prince Andrew's Congressional Chat: Epstein Edition 2.0
In a glittering display of UK politeness and American legal appetite, Ed Davey, the ever-optimistic Liberal Democrat leader, insists Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly the royal known as Prince Andrew, must face interrogation in front of both the US Congress and UK Parliament. This comes amid pesky whispers about his cozy connections to Jeffrey Epstein, the financier who moonlighted as a mega-scandal magnet, and Epstein’s unfortunate victims. Steve Reed, meanwhile, offers a uniquely British solution, suggesting the problem 'is not tittle tattle about David Lammy in the newspapers,' as if tabloid chatter were the true enemy. Accountability served with a side of parliamentary salad, anyone?
Share the Story
Because nothing screams transparency like summoning a royal to chit-chat with Congress and Parliament about Epstein while someone insists the real crisis is British media gossip. Priorities, am I right?
Calling Prince Andrew to testify in two parliaments sounds like the ultimate sequel nobody asked for but the world definitely can’t stop watching.
Why solve systemic abuse when we can have polite parliamentary polite and remind everyone that gossip about David Lammy is the real scandal? Brilliant focus!
Source: Theguardian | Published: 11/7/2025 | Author: Amy Sedghi (now) and Hayden Vernon (earlier)
More Articles in Politics
Texas Senate Hopeful’s 'Christian' Insta Stalk Includes Escorts
Trump’s Rare Earth Hoard: Greenland, Kazakhstan & China’s Chokehold
Schumer’s Shutdown Showdown: Obamacare or Bust, GOP Edition
Trump's Oval Office Stench: Commerce Chief Goes Full Gas Mask
Trump, Orbán & Putin: The White House Love Triangle Nobody Asked For
